Novel, the fictional Bridget Olive his sister Cecilia and Robbie to face the scene, her fiction has been distorted by the fact that she grew up, after all, is also to the truth of the story, even the people find a little comfort The result is the author bear residual [Popular] credit card no annual fee for life can be? bank credit card is somewhat non-permissive _ realistic and inviting the cool news. Can not say there is no outcome of its meaning, the story has always been in tragedy, we can not expect it to gain a comedy halo.
had given harm to others, the future is not know how to better deal with, and ultimately learn how not to annoy others?
“loving you, finding you, marry you, and live without shame.”
you will not last one day, calm, and as wide as the sea. Cool and bright and the need to understand their own evil.
but can not.
I quickly and carefully review their own in this world, what damage there is because of his ignorance and stupidity have no reason to increase the people and things around?
always are of limited human experience, not to mention a 11-year-old, just relying on limited experience and imagination to survive a little girl? Seemingly harmless stupidity and self-righteous ignorance, it is through this gap in mind, like illegal immigrants into her emotional blind spots, serious and a joke like, a huge mistake to implant the fate of three years, Should someone like me, looking forward to trace the course of transit, I think, finally, and I would like a taste of the more brutal is that a thorough.
a little girl fantasies can be more powerful force in the end?
delusion and imagination what subtle difference? I think just hanging by a thread. The former, such as hedge, the more depressed, the more distortion as well as deviations.
she herself, and her sister are all included in the novel ideal of love, imagination once again tampered with the outcome. At first the story because of imaginative subversion, and finally only silence at the hands of the imagination.
I think that Robbie woke up after waiting for him and Cecilia will be part of their happy ending, because they have been waiting long enough.
end of the movie, the initiator of the tragedy Bristol Olive, at the end of life to a novel form of all her remorse and redemption are all returned to this world, but I have been ahead of the game.
even every one of us inevitable, self-torture-like growth mode, self-harm gradually clear outline of their own, is not one day you will better understand yourself, understand your life and you are in. the world. sensitive
a precocious child, with her naive and foolish thinking that the “truth”, by fanatical imagination, the story of how suddenly altered?
to love, to love yourself, honest living in this world.
if they have regrets, because if her own fault, holding life-long childhood remorse, and ultimately no real sense solution that day.
I can such a seemingly ridiculous to start fabrication of a vulgar, but to the end of ordinary comfort.
I went to my room, from the 15th floor windows at the view around, in fact, anything not see into the heart.
But no.
Bristol Olive said her sister Cecilia and Robbie did not like the novel can be as, after many twists and turns of fate came together.
and parents quarrel, let them enjoy the uncertainty and anxiety, are there any? There is little or no change?
in World War II because they are forever say goodbye to this world.
and more cruel is that you finally found it stupid and guilty due to the fault of ignorance, often not just one person by their commitment. No-one can not expect those people who committed the wrong, when and on what is the way, cover up and walked in other people lifeline. An undercurrent of, or the reign of terror.
end of the story. I think, was only able to express only those out.

model (martyrdom) on [Example (Martyr) Theory]
this theory by Origen (Origen ,185-254-year) comes, it is said that Satan is the war victors , once people captive. Augustine also holds this reason [Top] Everbright Bank credit card out more than a year on the 200 the first year of fees according to income, because people were captive to Satan, it would need to Satan (not God) to pay a ransom.
payment). God accepts a symbol of Christ cover, will also put aside the requirements of the law, and because his administration to continue, so he will forgive our sins.
Theory) by Anselm (Anselm ,1033-1109 years) suggested. He said to commit the crime, so that some of the glory of God was killed. This reconciliation is necessary, whether through punishment sinners, or to meet requirements. God chose the gift of his son to meet the requirements. Christ through death, to bring the glory of God, and he received the reward, and he in turn passed to reward a sinner. This is called the gift of forgiveness of sinners, called by the gospel of salvation that has been immortalized.
a more recent view, called the accident theory (accident
sixteenth century Suxi Ni faction (Socinians) in response to reformers, advocating an example on the first (example
interrupt composite theory (recapitulation
Theory)
Abelard (Abelard) 1079-1142 years) the first initiative of this theory, the modern liberals, such as Bushineina (Horace
Theory)
So this theory is wrong, because it makes the death of Christ, Satan became the beneficiary of which is too high to see Satan. Cross is Satan trial, not to Satan ransom.
theory), by Albert Schweitzer (Schweitzer ,1875-1965 years) of the initiative. He said that Christ has been to indulge in his messianic mission, he preached the kingdom of heaven be temporary, but unfortunately was killed. Schweitzer does not believe that Christ death to others what is the value.
Theory)
Theory)
Albert Schweitzer view is wrong. Because the Bible does not mean that Christ death was an accident. Jesus has repeatedly predicted he would die (too sixteen 21, seventeen 22 twenty 17 to 19, twenty-sixth 1 to 5). Christ death is God plan (Acts 23); his death became a place of atonement, the value is infinite (Isaiah fifty-three 4 to 6).
weakness of this theory is obvious. Christ death was due to his love, and not his holiness, this theory also teaches that people in emotional changes, will lead people to repentance. The Bible is to determine the place of Christ death (Matthew twenty 28), so the sinner is to be in holy righteousness before God, and not just by the love of infection.
interrupt composite theory (Recapitulation
Although the focus has changed this view, Satan will pay the price to pay to God, but there are still problems in concept, this view emphasizes God mercy, God other attributes too, such as justice or holiness. This view also ignores the obedience of Christ, and Christ suffering and this view is not that Christ died for the penalty of sin, on the contrary, it uses the Roman Catholic Church. ” how much betrayal, how much should fulfill (meet), “the penance (penance) concept.
theory) by Irenaeus (Irenaeus ,130-200 years?) proposed this theory that, after Christ Adam at every stage of life, including crime experience. Thus, Christ can be lost by Adam achievements.
Geluxiwu (Grotius ,1583-1645 years) the first rule taught theory (governmental
trading on the (Commercial
accident theory (Accident
this point of view debatable is that crime to violate the sanctity of God, not Satan holiness; ransom in order to stop the wrath of God. Further, Satan can not people be free, and only God can.
< strong> Satan ransom theory (Ransomto Satan
death of Christ in the Christian doctrine, is a very important part. but, to his death there are many differences of opinion. Here are some of Christ death main points.
this view has the following problems: God will change into – he warned that there will be penalties, but not implemented (if God actually changed). Accordingly view, God is not pay a price for sin, the sinner will be forgiven, however, in the Bible, God says propitiation is necessary (Romans 24; John 2:2) – the wrath of God given quest for the abatement. there must be a place of guilt atonement (2 Corinthians 21; 1 Peter 24).
governance theory (Governmental
moral influence theory (Moral Influence
Bushnell), or other more “moderate “liberals, but also to teach the theory. moral influence theory, originally in response to Anselm trade theory, that Christ death is not necessary for atonement; the other hand, the death of Christ manifest his love to mankind, to soften the hearts of sinners so that they repent.
– from Paul Yin, “Moody theology manual”
theory), in response to Su Xini example of theory. governance theory is just an example discussed reformer two views of a compromise. Geluxiwu teach, God forgive sinners, does not require them to pay anything. Geluxiwu that Christ is due to insist on the principles governing the law of God, it is offset by a symbol of death to pay (token < br /> Theory)
according to truth, though Christ is called the last Adam (Cor 45), but I have never sinned Christ (John 3:5; about eight 46) This theory is incomplete because it ignores the Atonement; can save the people of Christ death, not his life.
trading on the (Commercial
theory). recent proponents is Godhead a theory (Unitariaus). This view is more radical than the moral infection on that side in the atonement that Christ death is not required. sin not necessarily bring the penalty, the salvation of sinners and Christ death is not related. Christ is a model of obedience, obedience even to death. This model is sufficient to move others to change themselves, to live as Christ did.
Theory)
This theory has many weaknesses, This theory is Christ who look, think Atonement is unnecessary, but the Bible emphasizes, atonement is necessary (Romans 24), this view also stressed that a model of Christian believers, but Peter, Cap 21 teaches, a model of Christian believers, not a model of non-believers.