Error of the atonement (ATONEMENT) theory

model (martyrdom) on [Example (Martyr) Theory]
this theory by Origen (Origen ,185-254-year) comes, it is said that Satan is the war victors , once people captive. Augustine also holds this reason [Top] Everbright Bank credit card out more than a year on the 200 the first year of fees according to income, because people were captive to Satan, it would need to Satan (not God) to pay a ransom.
payment). God accepts a symbol of Christ cover, will also put aside the requirements of the law, and because his administration to continue, so he will forgive our sins.
Theory) by Anselm (Anselm ,1033-1109 years) suggested. He said to commit the crime, so that some of the glory of God was killed. This reconciliation is necessary, whether through punishment sinners, or to meet requirements. God chose the gift of his son to meet the requirements. Christ through death, to bring the glory of God, and he received the reward, and he in turn passed to reward a sinner. This is called the gift of forgiveness of sinners, called by the gospel of salvation that has been immortalized.
a more recent view, called the accident theory (accident
sixteenth century Suxi Ni faction (Socinians) in response to reformers, advocating an example on the first (example
interrupt composite theory (recapitulation
Theory)
Abelard (Abelard) 1079-1142 years) the first initiative of this theory, the modern liberals, such as Bushineina (Horace
Theory)
So this theory is wrong, because it makes the death of Christ, Satan became the beneficiary of which is too high to see Satan. Cross is Satan trial, not to Satan ransom.
theory), by Albert Schweitzer (Schweitzer ,1875-1965 years) of the initiative. He said that Christ has been to indulge in his messianic mission, he preached the kingdom of heaven be temporary, but unfortunately was killed. Schweitzer does not believe that Christ death to others what is the value.
Theory)
Theory)
Albert Schweitzer view is wrong. Because the Bible does not mean that Christ death was an accident. Jesus has repeatedly predicted he would die (too sixteen 21, seventeen 22 twenty 17 to 19, twenty-sixth 1 to 5). Christ death is God plan (Acts 23); his death became a place of atonement, the value is infinite (Isaiah fifty-three 4 to 6).
weakness of this theory is obvious. Christ death was due to his love, and not his holiness, this theory also teaches that people in emotional changes, will lead people to repentance. The Bible is to determine the place of Christ death (Matthew twenty 28), so the sinner is to be in holy righteousness before God, and not just by the love of infection.
interrupt composite theory (Recapitulation
Although the focus has changed this view, Satan will pay the price to pay to God, but there are still problems in concept, this view emphasizes God mercy, God other attributes too, such as justice or holiness. This view also ignores the obedience of Christ, and Christ suffering and this view is not that Christ died for the penalty of sin, on the contrary, it uses the Roman Catholic Church. ” how much betrayal, how much should fulfill (meet), “the penance (penance) concept.
theory) by Irenaeus (Irenaeus ,130-200 years?) proposed this theory that, after Christ Adam at every stage of life, including crime experience. Thus, Christ can be lost by Adam achievements.
Geluxiwu (Grotius ,1583-1645 years) the first rule taught theory (governmental
trading on the (Commercial
accident theory (Accident
this point of view debatable is that crime to violate the sanctity of God, not Satan holiness; ransom in order to stop the wrath of God. Further, Satan can not people be free, and only God can.
< strong> Satan ransom theory (Ransomto Satan
death of Christ in the Christian doctrine, is a very important part. but, to his death there are many differences of opinion. Here are some of Christ death main points.
this view has the following problems: God will change into – he warned that there will be penalties, but not implemented (if God actually changed). Accordingly view, God is not pay a price for sin, the sinner will be forgiven, however, in the Bible, God says propitiation is necessary (Romans 24; John 2:2) – the wrath of God given quest for the abatement. there must be a place of guilt atonement (2 Corinthians 21; 1 Peter 24).
governance theory (Governmental
moral influence theory (Moral Influence
Bushnell), or other more “moderate “liberals, but also to teach the theory. moral influence theory, originally in response to Anselm trade theory, that Christ death is not necessary for atonement; the other hand, the death of Christ manifest his love to mankind, to soften the hearts of sinners so that they repent.
– from Paul Yin, “Moody theology manual”
theory), in response to Su Xini example of theory. governance theory is just an example discussed reformer two views of a compromise. Geluxiwu teach, God forgive sinners, does not require them to pay anything. Geluxiwu that Christ is due to insist on the principles governing the law of God, it is offset by a symbol of death to pay (token < br /> Theory)
according to truth, though Christ is called the last Adam (Cor 45), but I have never sinned Christ (John 3:5; about eight 46) This theory is incomplete because it ignores the Atonement; can save the people of Christ death, not his life.
trading on the (Commercial
theory). recent proponents is Godhead a theory (Unitariaus). This view is more radical than the moral infection on that side in the atonement that Christ death is not required. sin not necessarily bring the penalty, the salvation of sinners and Christ death is not related. Christ is a model of obedience, obedience even to death. This model is sufficient to move others to change themselves, to live as Christ did.
Theory)
This theory has many weaknesses, This theory is Christ who look, think Atonement is unnecessary, but the Bible emphasizes, atonement is necessary (Romans 24), this view also stressed that a model of Christian believers, but Peter, Cap 21 teaches, a model of Christian believers, not a model of non-believers.